Digest Archives Vol 1 Issue 90

From: owner-champ-l-digest@sysabend.org 
Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 5:02 AM 
To: champ-l-digest@sysabend.org 
Subject: champ-l-digest V1 #90 
 
 
champ-l-digest        Monday, December 14 1998        Volume 01 : Number 090 
 
 
 
In this issue: 
 
    Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and Focus 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and Focus 
    Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and Focus 
    Re: Character Comparisons 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: combat drones 
    Re: Character Comparisons 
    RAVEN appearances 
    Re: RAVEN appearances 
    Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and   Focus 
    Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and   Focus 
    Re: RAVEN appearances 
    Re: RAVEN appearances 
    Re: RAVEN appearances 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: RAVEN appearances 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
    Re: RAVEN appearances 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 98 11:22:21  
From: "qts" <qts@nildram.co.uk> 
Subject: Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and Focus 
 
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998 03:06:13 -0500, Scott Nolan wrote: 
 
>Still working on FH spells.  Still encountering questions. 
> 
>The description of the "Usable Against Others" advantage mentions that it 
>includes inanimate objects, and gives an example of being able to teleport 
>inanimate objects away if that power were bought with this advantage. This 
>implies to me that the designers intended this passage as an example of how 
>to create an offensive power with this advantage.  
> 
>There is no mention of inanimate objects under the "Usable By Others"  
>advantage; it mentions only characters.  How, after all, would an inanimate 
>object -use- a power like teleport? 
 
How about a sword which can teleport to its owner's hand if within a 
certain distance? How about a Gate? 
 
>Now, let us suppose I wanted to build a magic, fiery rock (I don't, but play 
>along).  I would use the Focus limitation on an energy blast, like this: 
> 
>6d6 Energy Blast, Explosion, No Range, Obvious Accessible Focus, 
>0 Endurance, Persistant. 
> 
>The power is not "usable" by the rock.  The rock is merely the focus of the  
>power. Come near, the rock, get burned. 
> 
>But what about powers requiring Line of Sight? 
> 
>I want to build a power that will cause people to pay no attention to the  
>inanimate object that the subject of the power (that's right, all you  
>grammarians - the object is the subject).  It isn't invisible; people can 
>see and remember it - just not well.  They pay no attention to it without 
>strong reason.   
 
Mind Control, AOE: Radius, at +20 Level Single Command 'Pay no 
attention me' 
 
>I'd like to buy it thusly: 
> 
>7d6 Mind Control, Telepathic Command (Ignore Me), Obvious Accessible  
>Focus, 0 End Persistant. 
 
Should have read ahead :}. Just add in AOE:Radius 
 
 
qts 
 
Home: qts@nildram.co.uk. 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 09:59:57 -0500 
From: "Michael Sprague" <msprague@eznet.net> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
Thanks for the ideas so far. 
 
> You're getting special effect and power mixed up. 
 
Actually, I'm not.  This is why it's making my head hurt.  :-)  There really 
is no Power to match what she wants. 
 
 
My initial suggestion to her was to consider a Force Wall.  She didn't like 
it, because of its all or nothing nature, combined with the fact that the 
Transparent Advantage is bi-directional. 
 
 
Entangle doesn't work here, because the Power itself does not match the 
special effects. 
 
 
Suppress is much closer, and might be the answer, but also has problems too. 
First, it requires a die roll to determine how effective it is (a very minor 
problem).  Second, I don't think that "All Attacks" is a Power or Special 
Effect.  With a base Suppress, your affecting a single power.  With 
Advantages, you can affect any single Power of a given Special Effect or 
even all Powers of a given Special Effect. 
 
I suppose one could make this a four part Power, using Suppress, where one 
component is a Suppress against EB, one is a Suppress against HA, one is a 
Suppress against HKA and the last a Suppress against RKA.  It would require 
one attack roll, and for Simplicities sake, I could let her roll the dice 
for one component, and have that value count for each one ... or even let 
her fix it at the average roll. 
 
Still, I think this would be pretty expensive.  One possibility would be to 
break this down into a multi Power, where each component was a variable 
slot.  She could then at least tailor her attack to the target in specific, 
and it wouldn't cost so much. 
 
BTW: I am in the camp that says multiple Powers can be combined into a 
single attack, without the use of Link, so the above "component" approach 
works in my campaign. 
 
From a different point of view, I guess I could allow the "All Powers of a 
given Special Effect" Advantage, and bend the idea of Special Effect to say 
that the Special Effect is any attack that causes PD or ED based damage. 
 
 
> Does this mean that she expects the target to take maximum damage 
> from any incoming attack?  If so, I wouldn't allow that, in part because 
> it's not justified by the simple reversal of the Force Field. 
 
Not at all.  She wants all attacks against the target to affect the target 
normally.  Any attacks (of a PD/ED nature) launched by the target would be 
reduced in effect by the amount of the Force Field.  She simply wants to 
turn her force field inside out. 
 
~ Mike 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 09:51:27 -0600 
From: "Michael (Damon) & Peni Griffin" <griffin@txdirect.net> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
Miss Litella...Miss Litella...Emily... 
 
	Yes? 
 
He said "such that if she puts it around a person, all their attacks are 
affected by the force field, but attacks targeted on this person would hit 
at full strength."  Not "she expects the target to take maximum damage from 
any incoming attack." 
 
	Oh? 
 
I'm afraid you've misunderstood again. 
 
	She doesn't want an attack power? 
 
No. 
 
	Oh.  Well, that's very different, then.  Never mind... 
 
Please disregard everything I said about the dleiF ecroF.  Once people 
started talking about Entangle and Suppress, I went back and read Michael 
Sprague's original query more carefully.  I was *way* off in left field on 
this one.  :) 
 
Damon  
 
 
 
 
At 10:18 PM 12/12/1998 -0500, Michael Sprague wrote: 
>Next, she points out that Force Field allows you to "dampen" incoming, while 
>allowing you to "shoot" out of them at full power.  In the future, she would 
>like the ability to "reverse" her Force Field, . 
> 
>On one hand I am trying to explain why the power doesn't work that way, but 
>on the other hand, it does sort of make sense.  Obviously, one would need 
>the "Usable Against Others" advantage.  And for that matter, there is 
>nothing to stop the target from moving out of the targeted hex. 
> 
>To actually do this, I think she would use a Multi Power, with two slots, 
>one for each specific use. 
> 
>Anyway, I'm torn on the issue.  We did tell her to come up with what she 
>wanted, and we could make it work.  What would you do or suggest? 
> 
>~ Mike 
> 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 10:10:14 -0600 
From: "Michael (Damon) & Peni Griffin" <griffin@txdirect.net> 
Subject: Re: (Force Field Reversed) 
 
At 09:59 AM 12/13/1998 -0500, Michael Sprague wrote: 
>Suppress is much closer, and might be the answer, but also has problems too. 
>First, it requires a die roll to determine how effective it is (a very minor 
>problem).  Second, I don't think that "All Attacks" is a Power or Special 
>Effect.  With a base Suppress, your affecting a single power.  With 
>Advantages, you can affect any single Power of a given Special Effect or 
>even all Powers of a given Special Effect. 
 
What if you applied the Variable Special Effects Advantage as well?  At the 
+1/2 level, the Special Effect for a Power can be anything.  Wouldn't 
Suppress, "All Powers of a given Special Effect" (+2), "Special Effect can 
be anything" (+1/2) cover that second problem? 
 
As for the first problem, perhaps one part of my earlier, off-base 
suggestion is salvageable:  Buy a number of dice worth of Suppress equal to 
the points in the Force Field, and apply the Limitation "Only 1 pip of 
Suppress per die" (-2).  No die roll involved, the dleiF ecroF will 
automatically Suppress a number of points equal to what  the Force Field 
normally absorbs. 
 
>>From a different point of view, I guess I could allow the "All Powers of a 
>given Special Effect" Advantage, and bend the idea of Special Effect to say 
>that the Special Effect is any attack that causes PD or ED based damage. 
 
Given that Special Effects are only permitted to include minor advantages 
and limitations, things too small to be covered by real Advantages and 
Limitations, I don't think you can legitimately call "causes PD or ED based 
damage" a Special Effect. 
 
Damon 
wondering what I missed *this* time :) 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 07:43:03 -0800 
From: Christopher Taylor <ctaylor@viser.net> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
>Thanks for the ideas so far. 
> 
>> You're getting special effect and power mixed up. 
> 
>Actually, I'm not.  This is why it's making my head hurt.  :-)  There really 
>is no Power to match what she wants. 
> 
>Suppress is much closer, and might be the answer, but also has problems too. 
>First, it requires a die roll to determine how effective it is (a very minor 
>problem).  Second, I don't think that "All Attacks" is a Power or Special 
>Effect.  With a base Suppress, your affecting a single power.  With 
>Advantages, you can affect any single Power of a given Special Effect or 
>even all Powers of a given Special Effect. 
 
This isnt a problem, just use the "reliable" modifier (a +0 modifier) that 
makes the dice always come up 3's, and result in a number you know every 
time (thus negating the roll entirely).  I use this for Aid spells in 
Fantasy Hero all the time. 
 
You can use all attacks as a special effect if you, the GM, decide it is 
acceptible, which Im sure you are aware of.  Id make it a fairly expensive 
advantage, (+1 in my opinion, see below), but it works fine, and develops 
exactly the result you are looking for.   The other option is to use a 
stacked 2 layer Suppress that is KA/Energy Blast, which would be roughly 
the same cost as the +1 advantage on Suppress.  This is going to be an 
expensive power, but it should be. 
 
- ---------------------------------------------------------- 
Sola Gracia		Sola Scriptura		Sola Fide 
Soli Gloria Deo		Solus Christus		Corum Deo 
- ----------------------------------------------------------- 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 16:55:56 GMT 
From: johnl@vnet.net (John Lansford) 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998 09:59:57 -0500, you wrote: 
 
>Thanks for the ideas so far. 
> 
>> You're getting special effect and power mixed up. 
> 
>Actually, I'm not.  This is why it's making my head hurt.  :-)  There really 
>is no Power to match what she wants. 
> 
> 
>My initial suggestion to her was to consider a Force Wall.  She didn't like 
>it, because of its all or nothing nature, combined with the fact that the 
>Transparent Advantage is bi-directional. 
> 
You could create a new advantage; "Transparent to Attacks Directed at 
the Target Only". This would be more expensive than the normal 
Transparent advantage, though. 
 
>Entangle doesn't work here, because the Power itself does not match the 
>special effects. 
 
Even if you use the Takes no Damage From Attacks advantage? 
> 
>Suppress is much closer, and might be the answer, but also has problems too. 
>First, it requires a die roll to determine how effective it is (a very minor 
>problem).  Second, I don't think that "All Attacks" is a Power or Special 
>Effect.  With a base Suppress, your affecting a single power.  With 
>Advantages, you can affect any single Power of a given Special Effect or 
>even all Powers of a given Special Effect. 
 
You could create an even more expensive advantage that says Affects 
All Attacks, but it would probably IMO be at least a +3 advantage. 
> 
>>From a different point of view, I guess I could allow the "All Powers of a 
>given Special Effect" Advantage, and bend the idea of Special Effect to say 
>that the Special Effect is any attack that causes PD or ED based damage. 
 
That sounds like you're giving the player something not intended in 
the rules, though. I'd bump up that +2 advantage cost for something 
that widespread. 
 
>Not at all.  She wants all attacks against the target to affect the target 
>normally.  Any attacks (of a PD/ED nature) launched by the target would be 
>reduced in effect by the amount of the Force Field.  She simply wants to 
>turn her force field inside out. 
 
That still sounds like a Force Wall more than a Force Field. 
 
John Lansford 
 
 
 
The unofficial I-26 Construction Webpage: 
http://users.vnet.net/lansford/a10/ 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 07:30:03 -0800 
From: Bob Greenwade <bob.greenwade@klock.com> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
At 10:18 PM 12/12/98 -0500, Michael Sprague wrote: 
>A new player in our group is creating her first character, and she has an 
>idea that makes my head hurt. 
> 
>She want's a Force Field, 1 Hex Area Effect, Ranged, and Usable by Others. 
>This way she can protect herself and/or others at range.  I can live with 
>this. 
> 
>Next, she points out that Force Field allows you to "dampen" incoming, while 
>allowing you to "shoot" out of them at full power.  In the future, she would 
>like the ability to "reverse" her Force Field, such that if she puts it 
>around a person, all their attacks are affected by the force field, but 
>attacks targeted on this person would hit at full strength. 
> 
>On one hand I am trying to explain why the power doesn't work that way, but 
>on the other hand, it does sort of make sense.  Obviously, one would need 
>the "Usable Against Others" advantage.  And for that matter, there is 
>nothing to stop the target from moving out of the targeted hex. 
> 
>To actually do this, I think she would use a Multi Power, with two slots, 
>one for each specific use. 
> 
>Anyway, I'm torn on the issue.  We did tell her to come up with what she 
>wanted, and we could make it work.  What would you do or suggest? 
 
   I think that your instincts are mostly correct here: the effect she 
wants can be done with Force Field, Usable Against Others At Range 
(+1-1/2).  Remember, though, that an Advantage of this will greatly reduce 
the effectiveness of the Power; what would be a 30/30 Force Field without 
Advantages, becomes 12/12 with a +1-1/2 applied. 
   The character may be better off going with a Force Wall, as many other 
list members will no doubt recommend; she gets the same 12/12, but a lot 
more utility in the package.  The only drawbacks are that it would affect 
incoming attacks as well, and should the target do more than 12 BODY with 
an attack it goes down until the PC's next phase. 
   Either way, a Multipower is a good idea, though I wouldn't consider it 
100% necessary (depending on the Special Effect). 
- --- 
Bob's Original Hero Stuff Page!  [Circle of HEROS member] 
   http://www.klock.com/public/users/bob.greenwade/original.htm 
Merry-Go-Round Webring -- wanna join? 
   http://www.klock.com/public/users/bob.greenwade/merrhome.htm 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 09:09:14 -0800 (PST) 
From: Michael Hayden <mhayden@tsoft.com> 
Subject: Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and Focus 
 
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Scott Nolan wrote: 
 
> But what about powers requiring Line of Sight? 
 
Indirect, ne? 
 
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ 
    Michael "Doc" Hayden -- mhayden@tsoft.com -- http://tsoft.com/~mhayden/ 
         Hey, I use Procmail (with Spam Bouncer), so spam away!  (^_^) 
 "What you are about to see is real. These are not actors; they're directors." 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 12:38:35 -0600 
From: "Michael (Damon) & Peni Griffin" <griffin@txdirect.net> 
Subject: Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and Focus 
 
At 03:06 AM 12/13/1998 -0500, Scott Nolan wrote: 
>Still working on FH spells.  Still encountering questions. 
> 
>I want to build a power that will cause people to pay no attention to the  
>inanimate object that the subject of the power (that's right, all you  
>grammarians - the object is the subject).  It isn't invisible; people can 
>see and remember it - just not well.  They pay no attention to it without 
>strong reason.   
 
The Fantasy Hero Companion includes a spell called Obscure.  It's sort of 
like an Invisibility spell, but it doesn't make the mage impossible to see, 
just difficult to notice.  It's based on Images.  For your purposes, what's 
wrong with: 
 
Images (vs. sight), -5 to the viewer's PER Roll (25 AP), 0 END +1/2, 
Persistent +1/2, Only to appear unworthy of notice -1.  Real Cost: 25. 
 
Okay, UBO doesn't come into play here, nor does Focus but is that 
necessary?  Mage casts a spell to make a large ironbound trunk look like a 
cheap wood crate.  The Image thus created is Persistent, so it'll continue 
to look like a cheap crate to whoever comes along unless the spell is 
Suppressed or purposely turned off my the mage. 
 
Hmmm...is Range the issue here, the one requiring the object be the source 
of the Power?  Would the Image cease to be effective once the mage moved 
out of the Image's range (125", based on the description above)?   
 
In some ways it sounds like what you want to do is create a magic item 
whose only Power is to make itself look ordinary.  But you want to use a 
spell to temporarily  turn *any* object into an item with this Power. 
Tricky...  
 
Damon 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 11:42:10 -0800 
From: James Jandebeur <james@javaman.to> 
Subject: Re: Character Comparisons 
 
> I obviously disagree.  There is too much possibility in Hero for a simple 
> formula to accurately approxmate all characters' combat potential.  There 
> are simply too many 'breaking pitches'. 
 
True, that's why I like to think of the "Rules" of X as Guidelines of X. 
They can't be any more than that, and shouldn't be used as hard and fast 
rules. Why call them "rules"? Would you buy a book called the 
"Guidelines of Acquisition"? :) 
JAJ, GP 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 14:13:25 -0500 
From: "Michael Sprague" <msprague@eznet.net> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
Following are my comments on the various comments that have been made.  In 
general, I have found every post to contain useful ideas, but it would be 
too much effort to post a reply to each one. 
 
From Damon: 
>> From a different point of view, I guess I could allow the "All Powers of 
a 
>> given Special Effect" Advantage, and bend the idea of Special Effect to 
say 
>> that the Special Effect is any attack that causes PD or ED based damage. 
> 
> Given that Special Effects are only permitted to include minor advantages 
> and limitations, things too small to be covered by real Advantages and 
> Limitations, I don't think you can legitimately call "causes PD or ED 
based 
> damage" a Special Effect. 
 
I agree, which is why I don't really like this method. 
 
> What if you applied the Variable Special Effects Advantage as well? 
> At the +1/2 level, the Special Effect for a Power can be anything. 
> Wouldn't Suppress, "All Powers of a given Special Effect" (+2), "Special 
> Effect can be anything" (+1/2) cover that second problem? 
 
Keep in mind that what she is looking for is four specific powers (EB, HA, 
HKA and RKA) with any special effect.  The Variable Special Effect Advantage 
might work here, and is worth another look, but she really doesn't need "Any 
Power of a given Special Effect". 
 
From Christopher Taylor: 
> just use the "reliable" modifier (a +0 modifier) that makes the dice 
always 
> come up 3's, and result in a number you know every time (thus negating 
> the roll entirely). 
 
I like this idea.  Of course, 3 means something different if your talking 
about a normal attack vs. a killing attack ... but I am not sure it would 
matter a lot.  I would have to think about it more. 
 
> You can use all attacks as a special effect if you, the GM, decide it 
> is acceptable, which Im sure you are aware of.  Id make it a fairly 
>  expensive advantage, (+1 in my opinion, see below), 
 
Note that the Suppress Advantage I was speaking of warping is already a +2. 
 
From John Lansford: 
> She could purchase Force Wall, and then an Indirect advantage on 
> her offensive powers. This would allow her to keep them from firing 
> while she attacks them from an opposite direction. 
 
Again, Force Wall does not work well, because of its "all or nothing" 
nature, and the fact that the Transparent Advantage is bi-directional.  I 
would have to create a new Advantage to solve the bi-directional problem, 
leaving the "all or nothing" part as still being a problem. 
 
As far as the Indirect Advantage, this would work okay for her own attack 
powers, but she wants it to work for everyone's attack powers.  Thus, 
Indirect really doesn't work well. 
 
>> Entangle doesn't work here, because the Power itself does not match the 
>> special effects. 
> 
> Even if you use the Takes no Damage From Attacks advantage? 
 
I suppose Entangle might work, if it were the "barrier" sort instead of the 
"restraining" sort.  This would solve the bi-directional problem within the 
framework of the existing rules, but still has the "all or nothing" problem 
of the Force Wall 
 
From Bob Greenwade: 
> I think that your instincts are mostly correct here: the effect she 
> wants can be done with Force Field, Usable Against Others At Range 
> (+1-1/2).  Remember, though, that an Advantage of this will greatly reduce 
> the effectiveness of the Power; what would be a 30/30 Force Field without 
> Advantages, becomes 12/12 with a +1-1/2 applied. 
 
Keep in mind that she already wants 1 hex Area Effect, and Usable By Others. 
This will not be cheap to start with, but what she want's to do is 
substitute "Usable On Others" for "Usable By Others", turn the Force Field 
inside out, and keep everything else the same. 
 
> Either way, a Multipower is a good idea, though I wouldn't consider it 
> 100% necessary (depending on the Special Effect). 
 
If I did allow her to swap Advantages and turn it inside out, Variable 
Advantage, limited to those two would probably be the way I would go. 
 
If they were two different powers, then I would suggest the Multi-power with 
ultra slots.  This would make it a single power with two different uses. 
 
Side Note: As a player and especially as a GM, I prefer the use of 
Multi-Power to reflect a single power that has several/many different uses. 
You pay slightly more than the cost of a single Power, and get a big savings 
because the rest are sort of redundant. 
 
~ Mike 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 11:54:05 -0800 
From: James Jandebeur <james@javaman.to> 
Subject: Re: combat drones 
 
> Think that if you want, but the rulebook is quite specific: the GM writes 
> up *ALL* Followers, regardless of origin, just as he does DNPCs. 
 
And therefore has every right to "farm out" the work to players if that 
seems appropriate. 
JAJ, GP 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 04:50:19 -0800 (PST) 
From: shaw@caprica.com (Wayne Shaw) 
Subject: Re: Character Comparisons 
 
>> I obviously disagree.  There is too much possibility in Hero for a simple 
>> formula to accurately approxmate all characters' combat potential.  There 
>> are simply too many 'breaking pitches'. 
> 
>True, that's why I like to think of the "Rules" of X as Guidelines of X. 
>They can't be any more than that, and shouldn't be used as hard and fast 
>rules. Why call them "rules"? Would you buy a book called the 
>"Guidelines of Acquisition"? :) 
 
Actually, I think it is, indeed, a rule.  Rules can have exceptions made for 
them, after all.  And I've really found very little need to mess with this 
one other than refining it a bit.  The only case I had to was a player who 
had some Absorption with a very narrow special effect, where the 
contribution to his DefX was obvsiously out of preportion to it's utility. 
But other than that, the formula and the character's observed utility (when 
played properly) was a pretty close match.  And it allowed me to permit 
mostly free choice on how the characters grew within that framework without 
having to reassess them constantly. 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 16:29:23 EST 
From: llwatts@juno.com (Leah L Watts) 
Subject: RAVEN appearances 
 
I know RAVEN was in Super-Agents and Eye For An Eye, but do they show up 
in any other Hero books? 
 
Leah 
 
___________________________________________________________________ 
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. 
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html 
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 16:21:50 -0600 
From: "Michael (Damon) & Peni Griffin" <griffin@txdirect.net> 
Subject: Re: RAVEN appearances 
 
At 04:29 PM 12/13/1998 EST, Leah L Watts wrote: 
>I know RAVEN was in Super-Agents and Eye For An Eye, but do they show up 
>in any other Hero books? 
 
Since RAVEN's half-page writeup in CHAMPIONS UNIVERSE notes that they were 
secretly taken over by VIPER in the late '70s (RAVEN is now just a funding 
source for VIPER), you'd expect there'd be some mention of them in the 
VIPER sourcebook.  I don't think there is, though.  OTOH, I didn't read the 
VIPER book cover to cover in the few minutes since getting this message.  ;) 
 
Damon 
 
|-----------------------------------------------------------| 
|************* Beware of geeks bearing .GIFs ***************| 
|-----------------------------------------------------------| 
|Damon & Peni's homepages: http://www.txdirect.net/~griffin | 
|   Children's Books -- Dolls -- X-Files -- Pulp Magazines  | 
|       Computers -- Gaming -- All Human Knowledge          | 
|-----------------------------------------------------------| 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 17:41:27 -0500 
From: Indiana Joe <jrc@mail1.nai.net> 
Subject: Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and   Focus 
 
>At 03:06 AM 12/13/1998 -0500, Scott Nolan wrote: 
>>Still working on FH spells.  Still encountering questions. 
>> 
>>I want to build a power that will cause people to pay no attention to the 
>>inanimate object that the subject of the power (that's right, all you 
>>grammarians - the object is the subject).  It isn't invisible; people can 
>>see and remember it - just not well.  They pay no attention to it without 
>>strong reason. 
> 
>The Fantasy Hero Companion includes a spell called Obscure.  It's sort of 
>like an Invisibility spell, but it doesn't make the mage impossible to see, 
>just difficult to notice.  It's based on Images.  For your purposes, what's 
>wrong with: 
> 
>Images (vs. sight), -5 to the viewer's PER Roll (25 AP), 0 END +1/2, 
>Persistent +1/2, Only to appear unworthy of notice -1.  Real Cost: 25. 
 
 I think that's a kludge. :-) I would use, "Invisibility, UBO (other 
advantages/lims to taste)". The special effect of the "fringe" is that the 
object appears to be non-descript and unremarkable unless they are 
specifically looking for it. 
 
 
  Joe Claffey               | "In the end, everything is a gag." 
  jrc@ct1.nai.net           |               - Charlie Chaplin 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: 13 Dec 1998 18:38:34 -0500 
From: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> 
Subject: Re: Questions on Usable By Others, Usable Against Others and   Focus 
 
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
Hash: SHA1 
 
"IJ" == Indiana Joe <jrc@mail1.nai.net> writes: 
 
IJ>  I think that's a kludge. :-) I would use, "Invisibility, UBO (other 
IJ> advantages/lims to taste)". 
 
There is an ability of a type of spirit in Shadowrun, the name of which I 
cannot remember off-hand.  The effect is that the victim (yes, victim) is 
detrimentally unnoticed.  For example, the victim of this effect crosses 
the street.  The guy driving the oncoming truck does not see him and runs 
him down without stopping.  Pedestrians and motorists in the vicinity 
notice nothing out of the ordinary and do not assist or make emergency 
calls. 
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
Version: GnuPG v0.4.5 (GNU/Linux) 
Comment: For info finger gcrypt@ftp.guug.de 
 
iD8DBQE2dE/3gl+vIlSVSNkRAgGRAKCBzCUqR8Nr0utQeSmNeKugGHQkvACfXIgp 
Cl1mYIO7n5vVrnASrO1tg7U= 
=ej+0 
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
 
- --  
Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>    \ Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly 
PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ accelerate to dangerous speeds. 
GPG Key: same as my PGP 5 (DH) key  \  
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 16:52:48 -0800 
From: Scott Bennie <sbennie@dowco.com> 
Subject: Re: RAVEN appearances 
 
> <<Since RAVEN's half-page writeup in CHAMPIONS UNIVERSE notes that they were 
> secretly taken over by VIPER in the late '70s (RAVEN is now just a funding 
> source for VIPER), you'd expect there'd be some mention of them in the 
> VIPER sourcebook.  I don't think there is, though. >> 
 
VIPER, p. 9. Though the Raven joins VIPER plot development was added by Hero at 
close to the last minute and really should have been covered in a lot greater 
depth. 
 
> >>OTOH, I didn't read the VIPER book cover to cover in the few minutes since 
> getting this message.  ;) << 
> 
> Well, shame on you. Nobody reads the classics anymore. :-) 
 
Scott Bennie 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 21:16:56 -0600 
From: "Michael (Damon) & Peni Griffin" <griffin@txdirect.net> 
Subject: Re: RAVEN appearances 
 
At 04:52 PM 12/13/1998 -0800, Scott Bennie wrote: 
>> <<Since RAVEN's half-page writeup in CHAMPIONS UNIVERSE notes that they 
were 
>> secretly taken over by VIPER in the late '70s (RAVEN is now just a funding 
>> source for VIPER), you'd expect there'd be some mention of them in the 
>> VIPER sourcebook.  I don't think there is, though. >> 
> 
>VIPER, p. 9. Though the Raven joins VIPER plot development was added by 
Hero at 
>close to the last minute and really should have been covered in a lot greater 
>depth. 
 
"Raven and the ReDirection Cartel were taken over as cash cows to fund the 
new VIPER."  Okay, there it is.  You can see how I might have missed a 
single line buried in the middle of paragraph four.  Heck, I had to scan 
through the whole page twice to find it *after* you told me where it was.  
 
So, Scott, feel like doing a 256-page VIPER Second Edition?  You can use 
some of the extra pages to cover the takeover.   :) 
 
Damon 
 
 
|-----------------------------------------------------------| 
|************* Beware of geeks bearing .GIFs ***************| 
|-----------------------------------------------------------| 
|Damon & Peni's homepages: http://www.txdirect.net/~griffin | 
|   Children's Books -- Dolls -- X-Files -- Pulp Magazines  | 
|       Computers -- Gaming -- All Human Knowledge          | 
|-----------------------------------------------------------| 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 21:05:24 -0800 
From: Scott Bennie <sbennie@dowco.com> 
Subject: Re: RAVEN appearances 
 
> "Raven and the ReDirection Cartel were taken over as cash cows to fund the 
> new VIPER."  Okay, there it is.  You can see how I might have missed a 
> single line buried in the middle of paragraph four.  Heck, I had to scan 
> through the whole page twice to find it *after* you told me where it was. 
 
And here I told Bruce to use a smaller font to make it harder to find. :-) It's 
also in the nifty chart of the VIPER organization. But it definitely needed a 
section at least as big as the one we gave Duchess. 
 
> So, Scott, feel like doing a 256-page VIPER Second Edition?  You can use 
> some of the extra pages to cover the takeover.   :) 
 
I may do some stuff with VIPER again in the future. Although Raven never did much 
for me; just VIPER with monocles and a little more aristocratic flair.  But I 
suspect if I sat down with them, and look again at how Steve handled them in Dark 
Champions, I might find enough hooks to do something I liked with them. 
 
So let's assume we (or somebody) were going to do a VIPER second edition, Hero 
System not CNM, that developed what was done in the 1993 book. What would you add, 
subtract, or change? What shouldn't be touched? 
 
Scott Bennie 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 17:26:19 -0800 
From: Rick Holding <rholding@ActOnline.com.au> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
Michael Sprague wrote: 
 
> Next, she points out that Force Field allows you to "dampen" incoming, while 
> allowing you to "shoot" out of them at full power.  In the future, she would 
> like the ability to "reverse" her Force Field, such that if she puts it 
> around a person, all their attacks are affected by the force field, but 
> attacks targeted on this person would hit at full strength. 
>  
> On one hand I am trying to explain why the power doesn't work that way, but 
> on the other hand, it does sort of make sense.  Obviously, one would need 
> the "Usable Against Others" advantage.  And for that matter, there is 
> nothing to stop the target from moving out of the targeted hex. 
>  
> To actually do this, I think she would use a Multi Power, with two slots, 
> one for each specific use. 
>  
> Anyway, I'm torn on the issue.  We did tell her to come up with what she 
> wanted, and we could make it work.  What would you do or suggest? 
 
	While this is very rough and may cause problems with the maths (and if 
its legal), try this.  Buy a Force Wall so that it will enclose the 
target.  Then buy AoE indirect centred on the Force Wall and defined as 
from the Force Wall to the centre.  Buy it with a hole in the middle and 
only affecting attacks aimed at the Force Wall.  Anybody launching an 
attack from the outside will have the indirect advantage added which 
will bypass the wall.  Makes for an interesting case when you throw a 
punch.   
 
	To make it even worse, remove the hole in the middle advantage and any 
attack launched by the person inside will have it redirected back from 
the wall to the centre. 
- --  
Rick Holding 
 
If only "common sense" was just a bit more common... 
   or if you prefer...  You call this logic ? 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 22:44:42 -0800 
From: Christopher Taylor <ctaylor@viser.net> 
Subject: Re: RAVEN appearances 
 
>So let's assume we (or somebody) were going to do a VIPER second edition, 
Hero 
>System not CNM, that developed what was done in the 1993 book. What would 
you add, 
>subtract, or change? What shouldn't be touched? 
 
I personally would like to see a more staged approach, so that you could 
show Viper at various power levels, a couple full layouts and write ups of 
bases, more tech, and a list of crimes and ways that Viper makes money.  I 
would love to see a big list of scenarios, short paragraph style ones, 
longer writeups of a few paragraphs (see Fantasy Hero for how they did it), 
in addition to the full sized ones in the book. 
 
- ---------------------------------------------------------- 
Sola Gracia		Sola Scriptura		Sola Fide 
Soli Gloria Deo		Solus Christus		Corum Deo 
- ----------------------------------------------------------- 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 02:43:25 -0600 
From: "J. Alan Easley" <alaneasley@email.com> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
>A new player in our group is creating her first character, and she has an 
>idea that makes my head hurt. 
 
Don't they always?  :-) 
 
>Next, she points out that Force Field allows you to "dampen" incoming, 
while 
>allowing you to "shoot" out of them at full power.  In the future, she 
would 
>like the ability to "reverse" her Force Field, such that if she puts it 
>around a person, all their attacks are affected by the force field, but 
>attacks targeted on this person would hit at full strength. 
 
>On one hand I am trying to explain why the power doesn't work that way, but 
>on the other hand, it does sort of make sense.  Obviously, one would need 
>the "Usable Against Others" advantage.  And for that matter, there is 
>nothing to stop the target from moving out of the targeted hex. 
 
I don't know any perfect ways.  A couple come to mind that are less than 
perfect. 
 
1) FF, bought Usable Against Others with enough extra targets to cover as 
many targets as you think are likely to exist in any given situation, 
Ranged.  Would be cheaper if you allowed the owner of a power that is Usable 
By Others to pay the END and control the use(beneficial effects only, of 
course).  Throw this on everyone and everything important, except the 
victim. 
 
2) Aid bought as healing, bought Usable Against Others, Autofire, Ranged, 
Triggered by Attacks to hit same target, Autofire limited to only as many 
attacks as Target uses.  Throw this on the victim.  (Kludgy) 
 
>To actually do this, I think she would use a Multi Power, with two slots, 
>one for each specific use. 
 
Yeah, at least.  With more to follow, I'm sure. 
 
>Anyway, I'm torn on the issue.  We did tell her to come up with what she 
>wanted, and we could make it work.  What would you do or suggest? 
 
I would go with the first one.  A bit of judgment is required to pick the 
correct number to allow for.  I would suggest that if she comes up a couple 
of targets short every now and then just cut her some slack and let it work 
anyway.  Eventually you can let her put more points in it to cover more 
targets if the shortage becomes too many or too often. 
 
Anything you decide is going to have to require a little bending.  Just 
don't forget to decide ahead of time with her what is going to allow the 
person inside her FF to get out, and that this is a pretty powerful effect, 
make sure it costs a lot and that it isn't going to overbalance your game. 
i.e. if it is too strong your major villains will be held mostly unable to 
hurt the heroes(STUN and Bodywise). 
 
Thanks for an interesting question. 
 
Alan 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 01:20:14 -0800 (PST) 
From: "Steven J. Owens" <puff@netcom.com> 
Subject: Re: It makes my head hurt (Force Field Reversed) 
 
Folks, 
 
> >Next, she points out that Force Field allows you to "dampen" incoming, while 
> >allowing you to "shoot" out of them at full power.  In the future, she would 
> >like the ability to "reverse" her Force Field, such that if she puts it 
> >around a person, all their attacks are affected by the force field, but 
> >attacks targeted on this person would hit at full strength. 
> [...] 
>    I think that your instincts are mostly correct here: the effect she 
> wants can be done with Force Field, Usable Against Others At Range 
> (+1-1/2).  Remember, though, that an Advantage of this will greatly reduce 
> the effectiveness of the Power; what would be a 30/30 Force Field without 
> Advantages, becomes 12/12 with a +1-1/2 applied. 
> 
>    The character may be better off going with a Force Wall, as many other 
> list members will no doubt recommend; she gets the same 12/12, but a lot 
> more utility in the package.  The only drawbacks are that it would affect 
> incoming attacks as well, and should the target do more than 12 BODY with 
> an attack it goes down until the PC's next phase. 
 
     Hm, I wonder if it's feasible to do this with forcewall & personal 
immunity?  (And maybe with usable-by-others on the personal immunity, so 
she can extend the "shoot through" ability to her teammates). 
 
Steven J. Owens 
puff@netcom.com 
 
------------------------------ 
 
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 01:40:41 -0800 (PST) 
From: "Steven J. Owens" <puff@netcom.com> 
Subject: Re: RAVEN appearances 
 
Scott Bennie asks: 
>> So let's assume we (or somebody) were going to do a VIPER second 
>> edition, Hero System not CNM, that developed what was done in the 
>> 1993 book. What would you add, subtract, or change? What shouldn't 
>> be touched? 
 
Christopher Taylor writes:  
> I personally would like to see a more staged approach, so that you could 
> show Viper at various power levels, a couple full layouts and write ups of 
> bases, more tech, and a list of crimes and ways that Viper makes money.  I 
> would love to see a big list of scenarios, short paragraph style ones, 
> longer writeups of a few paragraphs (see Fantasy Hero for how they did it), 
> in addition to the full sized ones in the book. 
 
     I'll agree with this.  In general, when I buy a supplement I'm 
looking more for usable writeups - agents, gadgets, vehicles, 
supervillains - than for background material.  Having a set of 
writeups for several power-levels, maybe some standard tactics and 
strategies to be employed by agent teams, some base maps and maybe hex 
sheets, are more important to me than organization histories and such. 
Fully-developed characters, with full information on how to play them 
(power and combat tactics, typical strategies, how to make them real, 
mannerisms, speech patterns, psychology, etc), are also useful. 
 
     Given a good set of resources such as above, then what I would 
want is scenarios that emphasize the role-playing aspects. 
I.e. "Venom should have a tertiary viper base with a viper lieutenant, 
three five-teams, a viper assault transport and three viper undercover 
cars". Followed by the plot, how to roleplay the different characters 
involved, timing elements, etc.   
 
Steven J. Owens 
puff@netcom.com 
 
------------------------------ 
 
End of champ-l-digest V1 #90 
**************************** 


Web Page created by Text2Web v1.3.6 by Dev Virdi
http://www.virdi.demon.co.uk/
Date: Monday, January 18, 1999 01:52 PM